参考文献
(c) 2024 Takeuchi, O.
A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, V, W, Y, Z,
Abrams, I. Z. 2003. Flaming in CMC: Prometheus 'fire of Inferno's? CALICO Journal, 20 , 245-260.
Amiryousefi，M. 2019. The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners' L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language learning and Teaching, 13(2), 147-161.
Altun, A. 1999. Patterns in cognitive processes and strategies in hypertext reading.: A case study of two experienced computer users. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8 , 423-443.
Arnold, N. 2007. Reducing foreign language communication apprehension with computer-mediated communication: A preliminary study. System, 35 , 469-486.
アスリーヌ、P. 他 2008. 『ウィキペディア革命ーそこで何が起きているのか？』岩波書店
Baddeley, A. 1986. Working memory. Oxford Univ. Press.
Baddeley, A. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36 , 189-208.
Bax, S. 2003. CALL-past, present and future. System, 31 , 13-28.
Beatty, K. 2003. Teaching and Researching: Comuter-assisted Language Learning. Peason/Longman.
Beatty, K., & D. Nunan 2004. Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System, 32 , 165-183.
Bhattacharya, A., & Chauhan, K. 2010. Augmenting learner autonomy through blogging. ELT Journal, 64, 376-384.
Biesenbch-Lucas, S., & Weasenforth, D. 2002. Virtual office hours: Negotiating strategies in electronic conferencing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15 , 147-165.
Blatchford, P. 2003. The class size debate: Is small better? Open University Press.
Blake, C. 2009. Potential of text-based Internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93 , 227-240.
Blake, R. J. 2008. Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. George Washington University.
Bradlow, A.R., Pisoni, D.B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. 1997. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of Acoustical Society of America (JASA), 101 , 2299-2310.
文化庁著作権課 (2023). 『著作権テキスト（令和5年度版）』https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/chosakuken/seidokaisetsu/93726501.htmlより入手可能
Burston, J. 2015. Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27, 4-20.
Caldwell-Harris, C., Goodwin, K. S., Chu, E., & Dahlen, K. (2014). Examining the advantage of a live instructor vs. video in a laboratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 191-204.
Chambers, A., & Bax, S. 2006. Making CALL work: Towards normalization.System, 34 , 465-479.
Chang, M.-M. 2005. Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a Web-Based Instruction---An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 , 217-230.
Chapelle, C.A. 2007. Challenges in evaluation of innovation: Observations from technology research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 30-45.
Chapelle, C.A. 2009. The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93 , 741-753.
Chou, I-Chia. 2012. Understanding on-screen reading behaviors in academic contexts: a case study of five graduate English-as-a-second-language students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 411-433.
Chung, J. 2002. The effects of using two advance orgnizers with viideo texts for the teaching of listening in English. Foreign Language Annals, 35 , 231-241.
Chung, L., & Gu, M. 2011. Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 371-335.
Clark, R.E. 1983. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53 , 445-459.
Clark, R.E. 1994. Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 42 , 21-29.
Clinton, V. 2019. Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42, 288-325.
Crossley, S.A. 2018. Technological disruption in foreign language teaching: The rise of simultaneous machine translation. Language Teaching, 51, 541-552.
Crystal, D. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Crystal, D. 2008. Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. 2010. Internet linguistics. Routledge.
Cummins, P.W., & Davesne, C. 2009. Using electronic portfolios for second language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 848-867.
Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J.H. 1999. Hypertext segmentation and goal compatibility: Effects on study strategies and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8 , 279-313.
Doughty, C., & Long, M.H. 2003. Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7 , 50-68.
Dudeney, G. 2000. The Internet and the language classroom: A practical guide for teachers. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. 2015. Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 20012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197-216.
Egbert, J.L., & Petrie, G.M. 2005. CALL-Research perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Egbert, J.L., Huff, L., Mcneil, L., Preuss, C., & Sellen, J. 2009. Pedagogy, process, and classroom context: Integrating teacher voice and experience into research on technology-enhanced language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93 , 754-768.
Ehynen, P.E., & Puimege, E. 2016. Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134-148.
Essel, H. B. 2023. 7 things you should know about ChatGPT. BELI. DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/AGWEQ
フォッグ、B.J. 2005. 『実験心理学が教える人を動かすテクノロジー』日経BP社
Figura, K., & Jarvis, H. 2007. Computer-based materials: A study of learner autonomy and strategies. System, 35 , 448-468.
Fuente, de la, M.J. 2003. Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A Study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 , 47-81.
Garrett, N. 2009. Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719-740.
Gass, S., Winke, P., Isbell, D. R. 2019. How captions help people learn languages: A working-memory, eye-tracking study. Language Learning & Technology, 23,, 84-104.
Gettys, S., Imhof, L.A., & Kautz, J.O. 2001. Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34 , 91-106.
Gitsaki, C., & Taylor, R.P. 2000. Internet English Teacher's Book: WWW-based communication activities. Oxford Univ. Press.
Glass, G.V. et al. 1998. School class size: Research and policy. Originally published by Sage and reprinted by UMI.
Gregg, K.R. 2006. Taking a social turn for the worse: The language socialization paradigm for second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 22 , 413-442.
Grgurovic, M & Hegelheimer, V. 2007. Help options and multimedia listening: Students' use of subtitiles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology, 11, 45-66.
Grgurovic, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M.C. 2013. A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25, 165-198.
Grimes, T. 1990. Audio-video correspondence and its role in attention and memory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 15-25.
Gruba, P. 2004. Understanding digitized second language videotext. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 51-82.
Guo, B., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Jiang, M., Nie, J., Ding, Y., Yue, J., and Wu, Y. 2023. How close is ChatGPT to human experts? Comparison corpus, evaluation, and detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.07597
浜野保樹 1997. 『極端に短いインターネットの歴史』晶文社
Hardison, D.M. 1996. Bimodal speech perception by native and nonnative speakers of English: Factors influencing the McGurk effect. Language Learning, 46, 3-73.
Hardison, D.M. 2010. Research timeline: Visual and auditory input in second-language speech processing. Language Teaching, 43 , 84-95.
ハーマー、J. 2003. 『実践的英語教育の指導法』斉藤、新里（監訳）第7章「ビデオの利用」（拙訳）ピアソン・ロングマン
Harris, T. 2003. Listening with your eyes: The immportance of speech-related gestyures in the language classroom.Foreign Language Annals,36, 180-187.
Hatano, G. 2001. A socio-cultural perspective on transfer and transfer studies. In White, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on foreign language education and research (FLEAT IV), 34-40.
ハーリー、J. 1992. 『滅びゆく思考力：子供たちの脳が変わる』 大修館書店
ハーリー、J. 1999. 『コンピュータが子どもの心を変える』 大修館書店
ハッティ、J. 2018. 『教育の効果：メタ分析による学力に影響を与える要因の効果の可視化』 図書文化
ハッティ、J.、チィーラー、K. 2021. 『教師のための教育効果を高めるマインドフレーム』 北大路書房
Holberg, B., Shelley, M., & White, C. 2005. Distancne education and languages: Evolution and change. Multilingual Matters
Hubbard, P. 2003. A survey of unanswered questions in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 , 141-154.
Hurd, S. 2007. Anxiety and non-anxiety in a distance language learning environment: The distance factor as a modifying influence. System, 35 , 487-508.
Hwu, F. 2003. Learners' behaviors in computer-based input activities elicited through tracking technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16 , 5-29.
池田真生子、竹内 理 2001a. 繰り返しの音声提示の聞き取りに対する効果：機能語と内容語の視点から『LET関西支部支部集録』8, 31-40.
Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, O. 2001b. Repeated presentations of materials: Is it effective for EFL students' listening? In White, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foreign Language Education and Technology, 584-591.
イリイッチ、I. 1989. 『コンヴィヴィアリティーのための道具』 日本エディタースクール
Ioannou-Georgiou, S. 2006. The future of CALL. ELT Journal, 60 , 382-384.
石井雄隆、近藤悠介（編著）2020. 『英語教育における自動採点—現状と課題』ひつじ書房
Jenks, C. J. 2009. Getting acquainted in Skypecasts: aspects of social organization in online chat rooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19 , 26-46.
Jones, J. F. 2001. CALL and the responsibilities of teachers and administrators. ELT Journal, 55 , 360-367.
門田修平、野呂忠司 2001. 『英語リーディングの認知メカニズム』くろしお出版
海保博之、柏崎秀子 20020.『日本語教育のための心理学』 新曜社
亀井節子、広瀬恵子 1994. 外国語理解におけるメディア多重化の効果：学習者の英語力との関係で Language Laboratory, 31 , 1-17.
Kei, X 1994. Foreign language education and media: From a situated learning's perspective. Monograph Series Vol.5, 81-89. Kansai Chapter, the Language Laboratory Association of Japan.
Kern, R. 2006. Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 183-210.
Kessler, G. 2017. Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 205-218. doi: DOI: 10.1111/flan.12318
Kessler, G., & Plakans, L. 2008. Does teachers' confidence with CALL equal innovative and integrated use? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21 , 269-282.
Kinginger, C. 2001. I + 1≠ZPD. Foreign Language Annals, 34 , 417-425.
河野守夫 1984. 『英語授業の改造』東京書籍
河野守夫 1992. 人は音の流れをどのようにして理解するのか：英語によるコミュニケーションの基本問題 『LLA関西支部研究集録』4, 13-49.
国語研究所 2002. 『日本語教材と著作権』国立国語研究所
Koyama, T., & Takeuchi, O. 2007. Does look-up frequency help reading comprehension of EFL learners? Two empirical studies of electronic dictionaries. CALICO Journal, 25, 110-125.
Kozan, K., Ercetin, G., and Richardson, J.C. 2015. Input modality and working memory: Effects on second language text comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. System, 55, 63-73.
久保田賢一 2000.『構成主義パラダイムと学習環境デザイン』関西大学出版部
Lafford, B. 2009. Toward an ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991) The Modern Language Journal, 93, 673-696.
Lam, Y. 2000. Technophilia vs. technophobia: A preliminary look at why second-language teachers do or do not use technology in their classroms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56 , 389-420
Lantolf, J. 2006. Sociocultural theory and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28 , 67-109.
Larsen-Freeman, D. 2012. On the roles of repetition in language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0009
Laufer, B. 1992. How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In Arnaud, P.J.L. and Bejoint, H. (eds.) Vocabulary and applied linguistics. Macmillan.
レイブ、J., 、ヴエンガー、E. 1993. 『状況に埋め込まれた学習：正統的周辺参加』産業図書
Lee, S. M. 2023. The effectiveness of machine translation in foreign language education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1-2), 103-125.
Levy, M. 1997. Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization Oxford Univ. Press
Levy, M., Bline, F., Siskin, C., & Takeuchi, O. 2011. WorldCALL: International perspectives on computer-assisted language learning. Routledge.
Levy, M., & Steel, C. 2015. Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, 27(2), 177-196.
Lewandowska-Tomaszczhy, B., & P.J. Melia 2001. Foreign language teaching and information and communication technology. Peter Lang.
Lin, H. 2015. Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis. ReCALL, 27, 261-287.
Macaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. 2012. A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education. Language Teaching, 45, 1-43.
マカロック、G. (2021). 『インターネットは言葉をどう変えたかーデジタル時代の＜言語＞地図』フィルムアート社
Meskill, C., Mossop, J., DiAngelo, S., & Pasquale, R.K. 2002. Expert and novice teachers talking technology: Percepts, concepts, and misconcepts. Language Learning & Technology, 6 , 46-57. http://lit.msu.edu/vol6num3/meskill/S
McGurk, H., & McDonald, J. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
美馬のゆり、山内祐平 2005.『「未来の学び」をデザインするー空間・活動・共同体』東京大学出版会
宮地 功（編著） 2009. 『eラーニングからブレンディッドラーニングへ』共立出版
宮本節子 2001. 『マルチメディア語学学習教材の開発と評価：理論と実証と』 渓水社
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. 2023. Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 100050.
Murphy, L. 2008. Supporting learner autonomy: Developing practice through the production of courses for distance learners of French, German and Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 12 . 83-102.
Murray, D.E., & P. McPherson 2006. Scaffolding instruction for reading the Web. Language Teaching Research, 10 , 131-156.
中島義明 1996.『映像の心理学：マルチメディアの基礎』 サイエンス社
中室牧子 (2015).『学力の経済学』Discovery
Nation, P. 1990. Teaching and learning vocabulary. Heinle & Heinle
Negueruela-Azarola, E. 2011. Changing reasons as reasoning changes: a narrative interview on second language classroom motivation, telecollaboration, and the learning of foreign languages. Language Awareness, 20, 183-201.
ネグロポンテ、N. 1995. 『ビーイング・デジタル』アスキー
日本教育工学会 2000.『教育工学事典』実教出版
Nielson, K.B. 2011. Self-stuy with language learning software in the workplace: What happens? Language Learning & Technology, 15, 110-129.
ノーマン, D.A. 1988. 『誰のためのデザイン？：認知科学者のデザイン原論』新曜社
ノーマン, D.A. 1993. 『人を賢くする道具：ソフト・テクノロジーの心理学』新曜社
西垣 通、ルイス、J. 2001. 『インターネットで日本語はどうなるか』岩波書店
西口光一(編著）2005. 『文化と歴史の中の学習と学習者ー日本語教育における社会文化的パースペクティブ』凡人社
大谷泰照 2007.『日本人にとって英語とは何か---異文化理解のあり方を問う』大修館書店
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representation: A dual-coding approach. Oxford Univ. Press.
Paran, A., Furneaux, C., & Summer, N. 2004. Computer-mediated communication in distance MA programmes: The student's perspective. System, 32 , 337-355.
Pennington, M.C. 2004. Cycles of innovation in the adoption of information technology: A view for language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17 ,7-33.
Perez, M. M., Van Den Noortgate, W, & Desmet, P. 2013. Captioned video for L2 listening and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. System, 41, 720-739.
Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct: How the mind creates language Harper Perrenial
Roed, J. 2003. Language learner behaviour in a virtual environment. Computer Assisted Langauge Learning, 16 , 155-172.
Rodgers, M.P.H., & Webb, S. 2017. The effects of captions on EFL learners’ comprehension of English-language television programs. CALICO Journal, 34, 20-38.
佐伯 胖 2004. 『「わかり方」の探求−思索と行動の原点』小学館
酒井邦嘉 2011. 『脳を創る読書-なぜ「紙の本」が人にとって必要なのか』実業之日本社
Salaberry, M. R. 2001. The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85 , 39-56.
サンダース、バリー 1998. 『本が死ぬところ暴力が生まれる：電子メディア時代における人間性の崩壊』新曜社
斉藤俊雄、中村純作、赤野一郎（編） 2005. 『英語コーパス言語学：基礎と実践』（第二版）研究社
Sanz, C., Lin, H-J., Lado, B., Wood Bowden, H., & Stafford, C.A. 2009.Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical conditions, and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59, 33-71.
Sasaki, A. 2013. Noticing and awareness in learning English as a foreign language: Studies on Japanese junior high school students' e-mail communicaion activities. Kinseido
Sasaki, A., & Takeuchi, O. 2010. EFL students' vocabulary learning in NS-NNS e-mail interactions: Do they learn new words by imitation? ReCALL, 22, 70-82.
佐々木正人 1994. 『アフォーダンス：新しい認知の理論』（岩波科学ライブラリー12）岩波書店
佐藤 学 2004.『習熟度別指導の何が問題か』岩波ブックレット
Savignon, S., & Roithmeier, W. 2004. Computer-meidated communication: Texts and strategies. CALICO Journal, 21, 265-290.
Schwienhorst, K. 2008. Learner autonomy and CALL environments. Routledge.
Serrano, R., & Munoz, C. 2007. Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35, 305-321.
Scovel, T. 2001. Learning new languages: A guide to second language acquisition. Heinle & Heinle.
Sha, G. 2010. Using Google as a super corpus to drive written language learning: A comparison with the British National Corpus. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 377-393.
Singleton, D., & Aronin, L. 2007. Multiple language learning in the light of the theory of affordances. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 83-96.
Sklar, J. 2020. ‘Zoom fatigue’ is taxing the brain. Here's why that happens. National Geographic https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/coronavirus-zoom-fatigue-is-taxing-the-brain-here-is-why-that-happens
Stockwell, G., & Reinders, H. 2019. Technology, motivation and autonomy, and teacher psychology in language learning: Exploring the myths and possibilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 40–51.
ストール、C. 2001. 『コンピュータが子供たちをダメにする』草思社
Sumi, S. 2011. Voices from EFL teachers: A qualitative investigation of teachers' use of CALL. In M. Levy, F. Blin,, C. Siskin., & O. Takeuchi (Eds.) WorldCALL: International perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp.293-312). NY: Routledge.
Sumi, S., & Takeuchi, O. 2008. Using an LMS for foreign language teaching/learning: An attempt based on the "cyclic model of learning". Information and Systems in Education, 7, 59-66.
Sumi, S., & Takeuchi, O. 2010. The cyclic model of learning: An ecological perspective on the use of technology in foreign language education. Language Education & Technology, 47, 51-74.
Sumi, S., & Takeuchi, O. 2013. The cyclic model of learning: An attempt based on the DBR in an EFL context. In J. C. Rodriguez, & C. Pardo-Ballester (Eds.), Design-based research in CALL. CALICO.
Suzuki, J. 1991. An empirical study on a remedial approach to the development of listening fluency: The effectiveness of pausing on students' listening comprehension ability. Language Laboratory, 28 , 31-46.
竹蓋幸生 1984. 『ヒアリングの行動科学』研究社
竹蓋幸生 1997. 『英語教育の科学』アルク
竹蓋幸生、水光雅則（編）2005. 『これからの大学英語教育— CALLを活かした指導システムの構築 —』岩波書店
竹内 理 (編著）2000 (3版2011).『認知的アプローチによる外国語教育』 松柏社
竹内 理 2004a. メディアの利用と第二言語習得 『第二言語習得研究の現在−これからの外国語教育への視点』 小池生夫（主幹）大修館書店
竹内 理 2004b. 外国語教育における視聴覚教材の利用：理論と実証データからの眺め 『地域における日本語学習支援』（日本語教育ブックレット６）, 第3章 pp. 29-50. 国立国語研究所
竹内 理 2007. 学習者、教授者、メディア---外国語教育研究の統合的な枠組みに向けて---『英語授業実践学の展開』90-102. 三省堂
竹内 理 2008a. 教育メディアの活用力をつけよう！『英語教育』, 7月号 32-34.
竹内 理（編著）2008b. 『CALL 授業の展開---その可能性を拡げるために---基礎、応用から発展まで』松柏社
竹内 理 2012. ICT利用の８つの指針：英語授業でより良く活用するには Teaching English Now, 23, 2-5.
竹内 理 2018. 音読活動を再考する－「活用する力」を育成する観点から Teaching English Now, 40, 1-5.
竹内 理 2021. オンライン外国語授業のあり方—その効果を引き出すために『ドイツ語教育』25, 4-12.日本独文学会ドイツ語教育部会
竹内 理、水越敏行 1999. 映像利用外国語教育の基礎研究：連想と予測の観点から 『ことばとコミュニケーション』, 3, 29-36.
Tamim, R.M., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C., & Schmid, R.F. 2011. What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning : A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Reserach, 81, 4-28
Timucin, M. 2006. Implementing CALL in an EFL context. ELT Journal, 60 , 262-271.
Tripp, S.D. 1998. Recent trends in educational media in North America. In the Media Literacy Research and Developement Section, National Institute of Multimedia Education, Japan. (ed.) Media in higher education seminar: Focusing on international contexts of multimeida and information technologies in higher education. NIME.
上野達弘（編）2021. 『教育現場と研究者のための著作権ガイド』有斐閣
Ushioda, E. 2011. Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 199-210.
Vanderplank, R. 2016. ‘Effects of’ and ‘effects with’ captions: How exactly does watching a TV programme with same-language subtitles make a difference to language learners? Language Teaching, 49, 235-250.
van Lier, L. 1991. Inside the classroom: Learning processes and teaching procedures. Applied Language Learning, 1 , 29-69.
van Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.
van Lier, L. 2001. From input to affordance. In Lantolf, J. (ed.) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
van Lier, L. 2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vasylets, O., Dolores Mellado, M., & Plonsky, L. 2022. The role of cognitive individual differences in digital versus pen-and-paper writing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 721-743.
Vitta, J. P., & Al-Hoorie 2023. The flipped classroom in second language learning: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 1268–1292.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard Univ. Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. 1986. Thought and language. MIT Press.
Walz, J. 2001. Reading hypertext: Lower-level processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 475-494.
Walz, J. 2001. Reading hypertext: Higher-level processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 590-606.
Warshauer, M. 2002. A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36 , 453-475.
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. 2000. Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & B. Roberts 1996. Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24 , 1-14.
Weintraub, H. 2001. The playful scientist as language learner: Re-defining the relationships between learners, knowledge, spaces, and media. 『外国語教育メディア学会関西支部研究集録』8, 1-15.
White, C. 2014. The distance learning of foreign languages: A reserach agenda. Language Teaching, 47, 538-553.
Wiebe, G., & Kabata, K. 2010. Students' and instructors' attitudes toward the use of CALL in foreign language teaching and learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 221-234.
(Akahane-)Yamada, R. 1993 Effects of extended training on /r/ and /l/ identification by native speakers of Japanese. Journal of Acoustical Society of America (JASA), 93, 2391 (A).
(Akahane-)Yamada, R. 1996. Learning non-native speech contrasts: What laboratory training studies tell us. The proceedings of the acoustical society of America and the acoustical society of Japan 3rd Joint Meeting, 953-958.
山田 (Akahane-) 令子、東倉洋一、Bradlow, A.R., and Pisoni, D. 1997. 第二言語音知覚に及ぼす視聴覚訓練の効果 『日本音響学会平成9年度春季研究発表会講演論文集』1-8-2、409-410.
山田恒夫、足立隆弘、ATR人間情報通信研究所 1998.『英語リスニング科学的上達法』 講談社
山田恒夫、足立隆弘、ATR人間情報通信研究所 1999.『英語スピーキング科学的上達法』講談社
Yeldham, M. 2018. Viewing L2 caption videos: What’s in it for the listener? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 367-389.
Yi, H. 2008. The effect of class size reduction on foreign language learning: A case study. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2, 1089-1108. doi: 10.1111/j.17498-818x.2008.00090.x
Yun, J. 20101. The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a meta- analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 29-58.
Zhao, Y. 2003. Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21 , 7-27.
Zhu, E. 1999. Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8 , 331-358.
(c）Takeuchi, O. 2024
Last Updated: 04/01/24